Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Advanced Chloramine Filters
Aquametrics has the best Chloramines removal technology in the industry.
All Aquametrics adsorbers can be regenerated to restore their capacity.
The relationship between carbon surface area, contact time, and the removal of chloramines from water is crucial for effective water treatment.

Most coconut shell carbons are 85% micropore slot size.Chloramines are a large Macro-pore compound.
Aquasorb’s unique pore structure consisting of Positive as well as Negative micro-pores, meso-pores, and macro-pores. Aquasorb adsorber has 90% Macro-Pores making it absolutely unique with a surface area of about 6000-6500 m²/g
A couple of key considerations need to be considered when selecting Chloramine water treatment:
Filter Media. Surface Area
Aquametrics ZVI 2800 m² per gram
Aquametrics AquaSorb 6500 m² per gram
Aquametrics PureRedox 1800 m² per gram
Calgon Centaur 950 m² per gram
Jacobi Petrosorb 1050 m² per gram
Surface area
A larger carbon surface area improves chloramine removal efficiency.
Chloramine is a much more stable molecule than chlorine. Its removal is not a rapid reaction but a slower catalytic decomposition process on the carbon's surface, often requiring a longer duration for the bond between the chlorine and ammonia to break down. This process converts the chloramine into harmless products like nitrogen gas and chloride ions.
If the decomposition is not completely finished Carbon can have its capacity lowered to 1/8th of the capacity it has for chlorine.
Contact time:
Longer contact times are beneficial for effective adsorption.
Flow rate:
The interplay between flow rates and contact time is critical for optimizing treatment systems.
If you're looking for specific figures or studies on this topic, I can help with that as well!
The relationship between carbon surface area, contact time, and the removal of chloramines from water is crucial for effective water treatment.
1. Carbon Surface Area
Activated Carbon: The effectiveness of activated carbon in removing chloramines largely depends on its surface area. A larger surface area provides more sites for adsorption, which enhances the removal efficiency.
2. Contact Time
Importance of Contact Time: Contact time refers to the duration that water is in contact with the carbon filter. Longer contact times generally allow for more chloramines to adsorb onto the carbon surface.
Flow Rates: Higher flow rates decrease contact time, which can limit the effectiveness of chloramine removal. Slower flow rates increase contact time, improvir d removal efficiency.
3. Adsorption Mechanism
Physical Adsorption: Chloramines are primarily removed through physical adsorption, where they adhere to the surface of the activated carbon.
Chemical Reaction: In some cases, chloramines can react chemically with the carbon, especially if the carbon has been treated with certain functional groups, such as Catalytic Carbon.
Optimal Conditions
Balance Between Surface Area and Contact Time: For effective chloramine removal, it's essential to balance surface area and contact time. High surface area carbon can be effective even with shorter contact times, while lower surface area carbon requires longer contact for effective removal.
System Design: Treatment systems should be designed to maximize both surface area and contact time, possibly through the use of multiple stages of filtration or varying carbon types.

The effect of pH is significant when using adsorbers (like Granular Activated Carbon or Catalytic Carbon) to remove chlorine and chloramine from drinking water, as the pH influences both the form of the disinfectant in the water and the chemical reaction on the carbon surface.
Here is a breakdown of how pH affects the removal of each:
• Removal of Free Chlorin
Free chlorine exists in two forms in water: hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hypochlorite ion (OCI). The ratio between these two forms is heavily dependent on the water's pH.
Low pH (Acidic, pH < 7.6)HOCI (Hypochlorous Acid) is the dominant species.
The reaction between HOCl and the activated
carbon is much faster than the reaction with the hypochlorite ion.
Result: Lower pH generally leads to faster chlorine removal and a longer lifespan for the carbon adsorber, before chlorine breakthrough occurs
High pH (Alkaline, pH > 7.6):
OCI (Hypochlorite lon) is the dominant species.
The removal reaction is significantly slower at high pH.
Higher pH slows down the removal process, often requiring a larger carbon bed or longer contact time to achieve the same level of removal.
Removal of Chloramine (Combined Chlorine)
Chloramine usually exists as monochloramine in drinking water systems (typically at pH > 7).
Chloramine removal is primarily a slower catalytic reaction on the carbon surface, not simple physical adsorption. The pH determines which chloramine
species is present:
• pH between 7 and 9: Monochloramine is the dominant and most stable species used for disinfection.
This species is the most difficult form of chloramine to remove with standard activated carbon, though catalytic carbons are specifically designed to enhance this reaction.
pH 4 to 7:
Dichloramine (NHCl,) is the predominant species. The species is unstable and much easier to remove.
pH < 4: Trichloramine (NCl) is the main species.
If the pH rises above 9, chloramines can start to dissociate into ammonia and hypochlorite ions.
If this happens, extra equipment will be necessary to deal with the ammonia constituentl.

ALABAMA.
Birmingham
Huntsville
ALASKA
Anchorage
CALIFORNIA
San Francisco, Anaheim, Fontana
Huntington Beach, Long Beach
Oakland, San Diego, San Jose
Concord, Chula Vista, Corona
Escondido, Fremont, Garden Grove
Glendale, Hayward, Irvine
Los Angeles, Moreno Valley
Orange, Pasadena, Simi Valley
Sunnyvale, Thousand Oaks
COLORADO
Denver, Aurora
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FLORIDA
Miami, Tampa, Coral Springs
Fort Lauderdale, Hialeah, Hollywood
Pembroke Pines., Petersburg
ILLINOIS
Aurora
INDIANA
Indianapolis, Evansville
KANSAS
Topeka
KENTUCKY
Louisville
LOUISIANA
New Orleans, Shreveport
MINNESOTA
St. Paul
MICHIGAN
Ann Arbor
MISSOURI
Kansas City, St. Louis, Springfield
NEBRASKA
Omaha
NORTH CAROLINA
Durham, Raleigh, Oregon
Greensboro
SOUTH DAKOTA
Sioux Falls
TEXAS
Arlington, Austin, Fort Worth
Houston, Abilene, Grand Prairie
Irving, Laredo, Lubbock
Mesquite, Plano, Waco
VIRGINIA
Alexandria, Arlington,
Newport News
Norfolk, Richmond, Virginia Beach
WISCONSIN
Milwaukee
Coming soon to your city!

Chlorine or Chloramines?
Clean clear and pathogen free drinking water or essential to everyone’s well-being and our economic stability. We must disinfect our drinking water. There are many ways to go about doing such. Economic feasibility Is the driving force behind many political decisions including health-based decisions on municipal drinking water.
There is an infinite number of water chemistry combinations in different parts of the country.
Hot and arid climate have a much more difficult time keeping a concentration of chlorine in the water dissipates quicker hotter climate. With the ever-growing population and new developments in cities stretching the boundaries further and further away from the distribution system more chlorine concentration is required for the furthest homes. This means people closest to the treatment facility are getting much heavier chlorine concentration. Chloramines help alleviate this unbalanced concentration Of chlorine.
Chlorimine is usually a secondary treatment after chlorine disinfects. Chloramines are added last in the treatment tree. Their job is to stay in the pipes and inhibit bacterial growth.
It took decades for scientists to identify a large number of disinfection by products and sharing with organic matter and chlorine. Manny want to say that Chloramines don’t pose the same danger of disinfection by-products as chlorine. The University of Indiana reported disinfection Byproduct Chloramines that they called the most toxic disinfection byproduct they’ve ever tested. Nitrosamines are fairly toxic and associated with chlorimines. Chloramines don’t have studies to validate these type of claims.
Chloramines are much less likely to break down in the distribution system but this also means they are tough to remove as the compound must be broken down before it can be filtered.
When chloramine does break down, it releases ammonia into the water. This in turn increases bacterial growth which subsequently reduces the pH of the water, making it more acidic/corrosive. As a result, chloraminated water can cause faster corrosion of plumbing both in the municipal distribution system and in homes.
With regards to physical health, excessive chloramine ingestion can damage the digestive system, while chloramine fumes in water can cause respiratory issues, and physical exposure can irritate the skin. Unfortunately, there is little data from the EPA regarding skin or inhalation exposure to chloramine, and inadequate studies in general as to the health effects of chloramine. Currently, chloramine falls under NSF/ANSI Standard 42, as an aesthetic water contaminant.
But as this says on the NSF website,
“Note that a filter won’t need to reduce or remove both chlorine and chloramines in order to be NSF 42 certified.
You might read a filter that’s advertised to be “certified to NSF standard 42 for chlorine reduction”. In that case, you know that the filter offers an expected level of performance when it comes to reducing chlorine, but that doesn’t mean it can remove chloramines.
Chlorine is and has been the standard sanitizer for all municipal water treatment systems since the 1920s. In more recent times, however, chloramines have begun to see more frequent usage. Chloramines are a combination of chlorine AND ammonia and, as such, require different filtration for removal or reduction. It is first necessary to break the bond between the ammonia and chlorine so that each chemical can then be removed in its separate state. As no such bond exists with chlorine, it is an easier task to simply remove or reduce chlorine as a lone entity.
The reason that use of chloramines is on the increase is that chloramines have a longer shelf life than chlorine. This means they will last longer before dissipating. In municipalities in hot climates with long water-distribution systems, chlorine might evaporate before it reaches the last house on the line unless large amounts of chlorine are used at the treatment plant. This can run into considerable expense and expose those living close to the treatment plant to high levels of chlorine. To reduce the amount of chlorine needed, chloramines are substituted. Because chloramines last longer, less chlorine is required at the treatment plant while still being able to have a residual sanitizer in the distribution lines at the last house.
If you are unsure what your municipality uses, call your water treatment department and ask if they use only chlorine or if they create chloramines. Chloramine use is more prevalent in large cities in hot climates.
What is chloramine?
Chloramine is a chemical compound that combines chlorine with ammonia to create a more stable, less volatile water disinfectant.
How widespread is chloramine use in tap water?
For many decades, most municipalities across the United States have utilized chlorine to treat tap water for the presence of bacteria and other organic contaminants. Within the last decade, the trend to use chloramine – either as a replacement or in conjunction with chlorine – as a tap water disinfectant has rapidly increased among municipalities, and the EPA estimates that at least 1 in 5 Americans use drinking water treated with chloramines.* More recent research suggests that up to 45% of Americans are served by public water supplies utilizing chloramine.**
Why do I need a special chloramine filter?
While most activated carbon filters will treat chlorine in tap water, chloramine requires a specific carbon formulation for treatment. Generally, very few carbon filters are designed to address the presence of chloramine in tap water.
I
With regards to physical health, excessive chloramine ingestion can damage the digestive system, while chloramine fumes in water can cause respiratory issues, and physical exposure can irritate the skin. Unfortunately, there is little data from the EPA regarding skin or inhalation exposure to chloramine, and inadequate studies in general as to the health effects of chloramine. Currently, chloramine falls under NSF/ANSI Standard 42, as an aesthetic water contaminant.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.